Day 3 of the ACA: Two cases, Two Wordles!

National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius

I still don’t have much to say about all of this. Read and hear more about this part of the case here: http://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_audio_detail.aspx?argument=11-393

Also, in the afternoon…

Florida v. Department of Health and Human Servs.

Usually there is only a single, two-hour session for petitioners to argue their case in front of the Justices. Often, there is little ‘argument’ since Justices are at their liberty to interrupt the presentation, and ask whatever questions they’re actually interested in.

It is unprecedented that a single case (though, of course, this is a bundle of cases each heard separately, but all relating to challenges to the same, as-yet not-fully-implemented law).

Read the business on the final part of this here: http://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_audio_detail.aspx?argument=11-400

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s